Sunday, 28 June 2009

I'm all atwitter...

So sorry, I haven't updated for somewhere near 2.6 squiftillion (thanks Lloyd) years.
However, I do promise to do better. I am now updating you (whether you knew it or not!) by Twitter. Check me out and Follow me here: https://twitter.com/naturegazing

Pictures, up-to-the-timeperiod updates on les animaux, and facty stuff.

Check me out.

Tuesday, 4 November 2008

Spiders in the Movies - Part 2

And so to the second in the series about 'Spiders In The Movies'. This time I will focus on a film that caused me to sigh in disbelief upon a recent re-watching due to its use of 'Hollywood' spider knowledge.

The movie in question is the inaugural cinematic outing for a certain James Bond. Please watch Exhibit A - 'Doctor No'. The key scene to which I am referring is a scene where the baddie commands Professor Dent to kill Bond by slipping a DEADLY CREATURE into his bedroom! Dent is then presented with a tarantula in a cage. To which, if he knew anything about spiders, Dent should have then responded, "Thank you Doctor for this docile pet. Now, where is a deadly animal that I can use to kill Bond??!"

Of course, Dent does not, he instead fearfully takes the cage at arm's length and whimpers as he retreats from the room. The spider is then slipped into Bond's room and wanders inexorably towards Bond's sleeping form. It then climbs the bed, creeps under the sheet and up Bond's body, until it emerges on his arm, finally waking him (heavy sleeper?). Bond is obviously no scaredy-cat - he doesn't scream, cry or start to babble incoherently: he just stares at the dark spider, planning his moves before the vicious and bloodthirsty monster in all probability devours him! Twisting with cat-like reflexes, he suddenly flicks the beast heroically to the floor, whereupon the music crescendos as he manfully squashes it half a dozen times with his standard-issue spy-shoe. What a chap.

"So, smarty-pants," you ask me. "What is likely to have happened in this situation?" Well, in all likelihood the tarantula's first thought upon being chucked into Bond's room would be to find a quiet, dark area to hide - safety first, eh? After a while it might have explored the room, looking for possible food sources - large insects, or maybe small rodents. The tarantula has poor eyesight, so it certainly couldn't have seen Bond from the other side of the room. If the spider were to have stumbled upon Bond, sleeping like a tired pixie, it would have probably ignored him. If, however, the womanising spy had rolled on top of the spider, or cuddled it too tightly (he is an amorous gentleman!), then the spider may have used its venomous bite for self-defence. Bond would certainly have woken up due to the ouch-inducing bite; and had to stay awake for a short while until the wound, similar to a hornet-sting, had eased its tortuous soreness. His arm would have been tender for a few days later, after which it would have been all healed up nicely.

So, do I think Fleming is a fool? Well, not exactly... the original novel calls for Dent to send a venomous centipede into Bond's room instead of the mostly-harmless tarantula - it was the movie producers that changed this, due to more 'awareness' of tarantulas as a scary beast. But Fleming is not entirely off the hook, because large, venomous centipedes, too, are rather demonised as deadly beasts, in a similar way to the tarantula (see the American Tarantula Society's article at: http://atshq.org/articles/centipedes.html). There are no known cases of death-by-centipede, although they can cause a very painful, nasty bite.

So, film-makers have a lesson to learn - tarantulas aren't deadly. However, until the general public embrace spiders as their friends I expect there will be many more instances of vicious spider attacks onscreen.

If you have been affected by the issue raised in this blog - the tragic criminalisation of the beautiful tarantula - then don't watch the following:
The Hound of The Baskervilles (Hammer version)
Arachnophobia
Eight Legged Freaks


Enjoy watching, Nature Gazers

Thursday, 4 September 2008

Spiders in the Movies - Part 1

Well, as a fan of spiders (I know many people aren't, but all I can do is gently persuade them!) and a film buff I thought it would be a good opportunity to combine my great passions and do a (sporadic) series of blogs on... (drum-roll please) Spiders in the Movies! I hope you find this interesting. (I guess this might be a long one!)

In this first blog of the series I will be looking at the portrayal of spiders in Spider-man (2002). So your homework this week is to watch the film and see if you agree with my comments!

Firstly, a synopsis. The film is based around a young lad who on a school science trip is bitten by a genetically-modified spider and then develops spider-related superpowers! He then spends the rest of the film (and, for that matter, the two sequels) exploring those powers and how he should use them to his and others' benefit.

Ok, I guess choosing Spider-man was an easy choice wasn't it? Well, lets look at the level of truth about spiders used in the film. Our first encounters with spiders in the film are when Peter (AKA Spider-man) and his class go to visit a lab where they are experimenting on spiders. It is interesting to note that none of the class seem to suggest any level of fear of spiders, apart from when Mary-Jane expresses a simultaneous disgust of/love for spiders.

The scientist shows them around and we hear her explain some features of various spiders in their lab. She describes one spider as the Delena spider which has the ability to jump to catch its prey. In real life the Delena spider can jump, but nowhere near as impressively as the (well titled) 'Jumping Spiders' - family Salticidae. Its better known ability would be that it can flatten its body to hide under bark as it hunts its prey - it is in the Sparassidae family (better known as 'Huntsmen' spiders, or 'large crab spiders'). As an aside, the Delena spider was used extensively in the B-Movie 'Arachnophobia' - it was portrayed as an extremely deadly species, but it in fact poses no threat at all to humans.

The other species shown are a funnel web spider (Filistatidae kukulcania) and a spider in the family Agelenidae (relative of the European house spider). They are then shown the genetically-modified spiders made by splicing together the DNA from these three spiders. (The screen behind Peter shows the names of the spiders used, but accidentally misnames the "Delana" spider.) As I'm not a scientist I won't argue the likelihood of this crossbreed, but suffice it to say the spider they used in filming this GM super-spider was real enough - Steatoda grossa. This spider was used, but was painted with red and blue stripes. The close-up shot of Peter being bitten was digitally created and suitably tweaked, as the Steatoda family don't have an eye-arrangement like that!

This Steatoda is a cosmopolitan species that is found around the world (only recently in the UK) and is a relative of the Latrodectus family which includes the Black Widow, Redback and several other of the most highly-venomous species in the world. Due to this relationship and their similar size and shape, they are sometimes called 'False Widows'. Steatodas can have a painful bite, but are not considered to be dangerous.

Peter is bitten by this malevolent little spider (quite unlike the vast majority of spiders, which are usually cautious of humans and rarely bite if they can run away instead) and then undergoes several remarkable changes in his body and abilities to make him more spider-like (aparently).


Let's look at how factual and relevant these abilities are:

The first is that his eyesight is suddenly improved and he no longer needs to wear his glasses. This is somewhat ironic as most spiders have very poor vision and detect predators and prey by touch.

Secondly he finds that he is suddenly rather muscley and strong. Indeed, spiders are strong, able to haul creatures of similar or greater body-weight up draglines and often wrestle with them while biting them. However, spiders (as with all invertebrates) have very different bodies to us comprising of exoskeletons, rather than skeletons covered in muscle. Spiders' legs work by moving fluids into the legs and out again at high speeds, in a process similar to a hydraulic ram. This is very efficient and is how jumping spiders can jump so far (up to 50 times their own body length!). So the changes to Peter's body aren't really like a spider at all.

Another feature Peter finds is the ability to climb walls. He appears to have minute barbed hairs on his fingers that help him to stick to most surfaces. (Don't ask about his feet, he appears to just be wearing extremely sticky trainers!) Well, spiders can indeed climb many steep surfaces. Some can even climb glass. The equipment they use depends on the species, some have tarsal claws (horny hooks on the end of their legs - usually found on orb-web spiders), others have scopulae, which are a pad of super-fine hairs, that divide down to become microscopically fine towards the tips (found on hunting spiders, like tarantulas) and adhere strongly to any surface. In fact some tarantulas are said to cling so strongly to glass that they can support up to 170 times their own weight! Peter's grippy-hairs are different to spider-equipment, but following a similar theme.

The Spider-Sense is the next ability - a warning system, "bordering on precognition". True, some spiders do have incredibly fast reflexes (maybe because they aren't thinking about their utility bills while they should be working), and many also have fine hairs and sense organs to detect air movements that could warn them of nearby predators, others still have additional backward-facing eyes that help them detect movement from behind. These features are remarkable, but are rather dissimilar to the 'psychic' sense that Peter seems to gain.

Peter notably also gains the ability to shoot webs from his wrists. He can create single strands to swing from, fire web-pellets at enemies, as well as spinning whole webs to form barriers. This is an extremely fanciful reworking of nature. Spiders can create amazingly complex structures from silk and use many different types of silk, depending on the purpose - orb web, drag-line, ballooning strands, egg or sperm-web. They pull it out of the silk organs and in doing so change the molecular structure of the silk from liquid to stretchy solid. There is one spider, however that can fire silk: Scytotes thoracica or the 'Spitting Spider'. It had silk glands in its head and can squirt a mixture of venom and silk at its prey to stick it to the ground before it goes in to kill it. This secretion is more like glue than silk, however, so it cannot really be considered the same. Peter also has no discernable spigots or spinnerets to create the silk. Weird.


And so to a final question: Could a spider bite ever cause someone to develop any of these attributes? Well, in the original comic book the spider that bites Peter is a radioactive one, rather than genetically-modified, and we are aware that some radioactive material can cause mutations in the body. This could potentially affect the DNA, but the structural changes in Peter's body wouldn't fully develop in this way - in fact he would most likely just become very sick, become infertile, or die. Any changes to his DNA would affect his offspring, who would be more likely to develop different body-structures, but almost certainly not benefically! If bitten by a normal spider, or even a genetically-modified hybrid spider, you are not going to have any mutagenic effects at all.

Enjoy watching, Naturey-Film Gazers!

Wednesday, 13 August 2008

A Petition... and a torch!

What's this? A petition?
Well, yes it is.

And is it to do with animals and the Natural World?
Um... no, it's not. Well, sort of.

Please allow me to explain. Recently I decided I should get a new torch to help me observe the beautiful creatures of my garden at night - moths, spiders, slugs (that last one is my Dad's hobby - saving the veggies!). So I saw an advert describing a fantastic looking torch, with is a low-energy, but extremely bright LED torch. It said it was 60 Lumens! I know, exciting huh?!

Hold on, what do you mean you don't know what a lumen is? Well don't worry, most people don't know either. A lumen is a measure of light as perceived by the human eye. This is a much more effective measurement than candle-power, visible distance that the light travels, or equivalent to a 60-watt bulb!

I liked the look of this particular torch, but really wanted to know how it compared to a non-LED torch. So I tried to find out how many lumens my old Mini Maglite was. It took AGES! But I finally found out from an online shop (who'd run their own tests on torches) that the Maglite put out less than 15 lumens. Well, that was good to know and I have since bought that LED torch ('LED Lenser Police Tech Focus' approx £30) and have been so impressed with it. The first night I had it I took it out in the garden and identified a beautiful moth - The Herald.

Being a high quality LED, the power consumption is only about 1.25 watts, so the battery life is about 50 hours (on 3 AAA batteries), and the light itself is a pure white, making it much easier to identify delicate moths at night compared to squinting at them in a yellowy glow from my old torch!


And so to the petition...
I decided that if people were aware of how energy-saving equivalents (like LEDs) compared to normal (incandescent) bulbs, they may be able to make good choices about saving the planet (there's the nature link!!). So I have begun an ePetition on the Downing Street website. The petition is to make it a requirement for bulb and lighting product manufacturers to put a lumen rating on all their products, so that the public can easily compare them. Knowing what a lumen is scientifically (check out Wikipedia's Lumen article if you want to know more) doesn't matter, as long as you can see that one product is 15 lumens and the other is 60 lumens, that will be enough to make a more informed decision.


Click on this ePetition Link to go there (if you want to... no pressure!)

I'm off to look in dark corners with my wonderful new torch!
Enjoy saving the planet, Nature Gazers!

Thursday, 24 July 2008

Which Season is your Favourite?


Well, let's see. I love Winter, it's not hot (which is good 'cause I don't like overheating), but it's often a little bleak and lifeless. Spring is great when things start growing again. New flowers, little new animaux - fab. Autumn is often my fave because of the pretty leaves, the animals preparing for Christmas, the nice temperature - a well stocked season!

But I'm surprising myself at how much I'm enjoying Summer at the moment. After Spring's slow beginning, everything seems to be ramping up and getting abundant. The butterflies were a bit late, but they're here now, as are my friends the dragonflies. The spiders are loving it too, and the surrounding countryside is full of squeaks, squawks, and cheery creatures.

The other day I was relaxing on the grass in the sunshine. Suddenly I saw, about 6 inches above my face, a lovely little Common Darter (dragonfly) hovering. It flitted away a few inches when my fiancee, who was lying face-down next to me, moved her head upon spotting it. Then it came back, hovering over my body, before gently settling on my finger!!

We gazed at it in excitement. It was a pretty wee thing. About 2 inches long and with its greeny-yellow body angled to gather warmth from the sun; I kept my hand still as we watched it as it sunbathed for a few minutes, a couple of times lifting off and settling again to change its position. It was a really joyful and special experience. We hadn't gone out looking for it, it had just happened because we were there and willing to let it happen.

It was one of those being-in-touch-with-nature sort of moments, where you get a priveleged and up-close connection with something completely wild and knowing that you're not intruding, you're just sharing time with them.


The other dragonflies and damselflies were out on the pond too and we took some pictures. The Nursery Web spiders (Pisaura mirabilis) were sitting by their nurseries as the young spiderlings relaxed inside, having recently hatched out. It was a charming, lively, naturey day - the sort that 'almost' convinces me the Summer is the best season!

Enjoy the weather, Nature Gazers.

Friday, 4 July 2008

Moths and such...

The Moth Survey period is ending, and as I am ashamed to say I haven't had the chance to do a proper moth trap myself, I thought I'd slightly redeem myself by sharing some interesting facts about moths and butterflies with you. Enjoy...


Butterflies and moths are in the same family - Lepidoptera (meaning 'scale wing' - because of the powdery coating of coloured particles that cover their wings). You can usually tell the two groups apart by using a number of 'rules', but there are exceptions to the rules in every case. This means that the distinction between butterflies and moths is not based on any clear physical differences between the two groups, so perhaps the most correct classification is to refer to them all as the same group and not as 'butterflies' or 'moths'!
But I'm not that pedantic, so here's the best way of telling the difference.


Moths:
mostly fly at night,
usually rest with wings apart or folded flat over back,
usually have slender or feathery antennae,
often pupate in a silken coccoon,
frequently are plain coloured and drab (greys and browns),
commonly have stout, furry bodies.


Butterflies:
mostly fly in daytime,
usually rest with wings closed,
mostly have slender antennae with a blob (or 'club') on the end,
pupate in a hardened crysalis,
mostly are brightly coloured and patterned,
commonly have smooth, thinner bodies.


Some exceptions:
Day-flying moths like the burnet moths (which also have rather clubbed antennae).
Elephant Hawk-moth and Hummingbird Hawk-moth are brightly coloured and patterned.

Hedylid butterflies fly at night.
Families like Whites and Browns are often quite drab.
Skipper family rest with wings apart (as do some other species at times to maintain a good body temperature).


I hope this has been interesting and informative for you.
Stay tuned for more 'interesting stuff', Nature Gazers!

Tuesday, 1 July 2008

Photos, pics, pix...

Hooray! The first batch of photographs are up on the website. Click the 'Gallery' link in the bar above to see them.

Currently you can click on any image to go to a bigger version, which will open in a new window (or tab, depending on your browser). In time I will develop a new page for each large image, so this doesn't happen.

I hope you like the pictures - I took them all myself using a Canon Ixus 60 digital camera on macro mode (and a lot of patience!).

Enjoy, Nature Gazers.

(PS I promise to do another write-up or review soon - I've just been quite busy working on the website these last couple of weeks.)